| Home » Economics Homework Help » International Economics » Infant Industry Argument |
Infant Industry Argument
Many economists including Alexandra Hamilton (U.S.A.), F. List (Germany) and J.S. Mill (England) held that infant industries during the early stage of their development require protection from keen competition from long established foreign industries. Such an industry, in the initial stages of its growth needs full protection from the state without which, it cannot survive. For an infant industry, operating costs during the transition period are high. As such it cannot compete with established foreign exporters. This is particularly true of a country that is attempting to initiate industrialization. By imposing a tariff on import, the domestic price is, therefore, raised sufficiently to allow the high costs of domestic producers to maintain themselves.
In fact almost every industrialized country has had to protect its industries against foreign competition for a temporary period so as to enable it to consolidate its position. And now it is considered entirely legitimate for economically backward countries to protect their industries in the early stages to enable them to grow to their full stature without any mishap.
However, the exponents of the infant industry argument emphasized that protection should be temporary and should be removed immediately after it has performed its function of ‘nursing’. In this regard, ‘nurse the baby, protect the child, and leave the adult’ is a well-known saying. It is also held that protection should not be given indiscriminately but only to those infant industries, which have potentialities to develop fast and become self-financing and efficient in the long run. An infant industry which does not have such natural and other facilities and advantages to grow deserves no protection, as it will be an unnecessary curb on general welfare to impose a burden on the economic waste. If an uneconomic unit came into existence due to protection, when it is removed it will not be able to face foreign competition and thus it would be a waste. If protection is given further, it would mean permanent protection which would again be a waste. In India the sugar industry is a case of such protection.
List, therefore, advocated a policy of discriminating protection. For protection does not provide any incentive to the industry to economise. Because it puts a premium on inefficiency it should not be granted to every industry but should be given only to those industries which are capable potentially of becoming viable units.
Further, the infant industry argument is not against free trade. It advocates protection temporarily only in the initial stages, so that all countries should develop themselves fully and the volume of trade is maximised. Once the industry becomes mature enough protection should be withdrawn.
Services: - Infant Industry Argument Homework | Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Homework Help Services | Live Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Homework Tutors | Online Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Tutors | Online Infant Industry Argument Tutors | Infant Industry Argument Homework Services | Infant Industry Argument
In fact almost every industrialized country has had to protect its industries against foreign competition for a temporary period so as to enable it to consolidate its position. And now it is considered entirely legitimate for economically backward countries to protect their industries in the early stages to enable them to grow to their full stature without any mishap.
However, the exponents of the infant industry argument emphasized that protection should be temporary and should be removed immediately after it has performed its function of ‘nursing’. In this regard, ‘nurse the baby, protect the child, and leave the adult’ is a well-known saying. It is also held that protection should not be given indiscriminately but only to those infant industries, which have potentialities to develop fast and become self-financing and efficient in the long run. An infant industry which does not have such natural and other facilities and advantages to grow deserves no protection, as it will be an unnecessary curb on general welfare to impose a burden on the economic waste. If an uneconomic unit came into existence due to protection, when it is removed it will not be able to face foreign competition and thus it would be a waste. If protection is given further, it would mean permanent protection which would again be a waste. In India the sugar industry is a case of such protection.
List, therefore, advocated a policy of discriminating protection. For protection does not provide any incentive to the industry to economise. Because it puts a premium on inefficiency it should not be granted to every industry but should be given only to those industries which are capable potentially of becoming viable units.
Further, the infant industry argument is not against free trade. It advocates protection temporarily only in the initial stages, so that all countries should develop themselves fully and the volume of trade is maximised. Once the industry becomes mature enough protection should be withdrawn.
Services: - Infant Industry Argument Homework | Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Homework Help Services | Live Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Homework Tutors | Online Infant Industry Argument Homework Help | Infant Industry Argument Tutors | Online Infant Industry Argument Tutors | Infant Industry Argument Homework Services | Infant Industry Argument
Submit Your Query ???
Assignment Help
Microeconomics Help
Macroeconomics Help
International Economics
Business Economics Help
Topics
Comparative Costs-Goods
Comparative Costs-Countries
Economic Integration
Customs Union Equilibrium
Customs Union Dynamic Effect
Customs Union Pure Theory
Euro-Dollar Market
Euro-Dollar-Benefits, Effects
Exchange Control Effect
Exchange Control
Exchange Control Methods
Exchange Control Procedure
Price Equalization
Intra Industry Trade Factors
Ohlin- Two Country Model
Intra-Industry Trade
Foreign Direct Investment
Industry Argument Diversification
Free Trade
Infant Industry Argument
Non-Economic Arguments
Employment Promotion Argument
Protection As Trade Policy
Protection-Developing Countries
Non-Tariff Barriers
Origin Of Gatt
Tariff Negotiations
Effects Of Quotas
Quotas Vs Tariffs
Quotas- Nature, Purpose
Import Quotas Types
Heterogeneous Markets
Internal, International Trade
International Trade Theory
International Transactions
Trade- Pure, Monetary Theory
Capital Movement Factors
Capital Movements Role
Capital Movements
International Development Ass.
International Finance Corp.
The World Bank
International Liquidity Adequacy
IMF, International Liquidity
International Liquidity
Paper Gold
Revaluation Of Gold
SDRS Salient Features
SDRS Operations
Symmetry- Monetary System
Triffins Radical Transformation
IMF Achievements
IMF Objectives, Functions
IMF Structure
Quotas
IMF Nature
Modern International Trade
International Trade Development
Product Cycle Hypothesis
Constant Factor Supply
Product Price Increase Effect
Vent-for-Surplus Approach
Foreign Trade Gains
Trade Gains Nature
Factors Determining Gain Size
Sources Of Gain
Factor Proportion Theory
Factor Proportions Assumptions
Trade Modern Theory
Factors Proportions Shortcomings
Absolute Cost Advantage
Gold Standard Mechanism
Underdevelop Comparative Costs
Comparative Costs Doctrine
Comparative Advantage Doctrine
Gold Standard Advantages
International Gold Standard
Gold Standard Game Rules
International Cartels
Price Discrimination, Dumping




Homework Help, Online Tutor, Online Tutoring Available For All Subjects. Some useful topics are given below :