| Home » Economics Homework Help » International Economics » Tariff Negotiations |
Tariff Negotiations
GATT recognizes that tariffs are the main impediments to the growth of international trade. Thus, the contracting parties are authorised to occasionally negotiate for a substantial reduction of tariffs.
The following guidelines are to be followed in tariff negotiations:
1. Reduction in tariffs is to be negotiated on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.
2. The negotiation should be either for reduction of tariffs or binding of low tariffs. Binding of low tariffs is advantageous as traders will be assured of the continuance of low tariffs so that they can take up business expansion and productive investments without any risk (of high tariff).
3. Each member has to work in good faith and not raise its tariffs and other quantitative measures with a view to increasing its bargaining power in tariff negotiation (when anticipated).
The GATT adopted the bilateral-multilateral technique of negotiating reduction in tariffs. It was a bilateral method in the sense that the negotiations were carried on a nation-to-nation basis. In fact, the contradicting parties formed pairs among themselves and each pair conducted negotiations on a selective commodity-by-commodity basis. The negotiations had multilateral aspects also as the tariff reductions agreed within bilateral pairs of negotiation parties were made generally applicable to all contracting parties through the “most-favored-nation-clause”.
The bilateral-multilateral method of tariff negotiations was in vogue till the operation of the Kennedy Round, on May 4, 1964. Before Kennedy Round five main tariff negotiating conference had been held which effected agreements (bindings) to reduce or to stabilize about 60,000 tariff rates between the participating countries.
The bilateral-multilateral technique of tariff reduction has the following drawbacks:
1. It leads to unfavorable terms of trade to the underdeveloped primary producing nations on account of their weak bargaining position in a bilateral agreement with an advanced nation. The principle or reciprocity was injurious to their interest.
2. It creates uncertainty and instability in the tariff structure of various countries.
3. It causes injustice to the already low-tariff countries, as they are in a very weak bargaining position and have little to offer in exchange for concessions offered by other countries (previously with high tariffs).
4. It is a very slow method of reducing tariffs. Hence the achievements made during a long period of 14 years of its operation are not very substantial or encouraging.
In fact, at the Ministerial meeting of the contracting parties in 1961, it was agreed that the reduction of tariffs on a most-favoured-nation basis should be continued but in view of the changing conditions of world trade, the traditional GATT technique for tariff negotiation on a commodity-by-commodity and nation-by-nation basis are inadequate and inappropriate. Hence, ultimately the bilateral aspect of negotiations was given up in Kennedy Round.
Services: - Tariff Negotiations Homework | Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Homework Help Services | Live Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Homework Tutors | Online Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Tutors | Online Tariff Negotiations Tutors | Tariff Negotiations Homework Services | Tariff Negotiations
The following guidelines are to be followed in tariff negotiations:
1. Reduction in tariffs is to be negotiated on a reciprocal and mutually advantageous basis.
2. The negotiation should be either for reduction of tariffs or binding of low tariffs. Binding of low tariffs is advantageous as traders will be assured of the continuance of low tariffs so that they can take up business expansion and productive investments without any risk (of high tariff).
3. Each member has to work in good faith and not raise its tariffs and other quantitative measures with a view to increasing its bargaining power in tariff negotiation (when anticipated).
The GATT adopted the bilateral-multilateral technique of negotiating reduction in tariffs. It was a bilateral method in the sense that the negotiations were carried on a nation-to-nation basis. In fact, the contradicting parties formed pairs among themselves and each pair conducted negotiations on a selective commodity-by-commodity basis. The negotiations had multilateral aspects also as the tariff reductions agreed within bilateral pairs of negotiation parties were made generally applicable to all contracting parties through the “most-favored-nation-clause”.
The bilateral-multilateral method of tariff negotiations was in vogue till the operation of the Kennedy Round, on May 4, 1964. Before Kennedy Round five main tariff negotiating conference had been held which effected agreements (bindings) to reduce or to stabilize about 60,000 tariff rates between the participating countries.
The bilateral-multilateral technique of tariff reduction has the following drawbacks:
1. It leads to unfavorable terms of trade to the underdeveloped primary producing nations on account of their weak bargaining position in a bilateral agreement with an advanced nation. The principle or reciprocity was injurious to their interest.
2. It creates uncertainty and instability in the tariff structure of various countries.
3. It causes injustice to the already low-tariff countries, as they are in a very weak bargaining position and have little to offer in exchange for concessions offered by other countries (previously with high tariffs).
4. It is a very slow method of reducing tariffs. Hence the achievements made during a long period of 14 years of its operation are not very substantial or encouraging.
In fact, at the Ministerial meeting of the contracting parties in 1961, it was agreed that the reduction of tariffs on a most-favoured-nation basis should be continued but in view of the changing conditions of world trade, the traditional GATT technique for tariff negotiation on a commodity-by-commodity and nation-by-nation basis are inadequate and inappropriate. Hence, ultimately the bilateral aspect of negotiations was given up in Kennedy Round.
Services: - Tariff Negotiations Homework | Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Homework Help Services | Live Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Homework Tutors | Online Tariff Negotiations Homework Help | Tariff Negotiations Tutors | Online Tariff Negotiations Tutors | Tariff Negotiations Homework Services | Tariff Negotiations
Submit Your Query ???
Assignment Help
Microeconomics Help
Macroeconomics Help
International Economics
Business Economics Help
Topics
Comparative Costs-Goods
Comparative Costs-Countries
Economic Integration
Customs Union Equilibrium
Customs Union Dynamic Effect
Customs Union Pure Theory
Euro-Dollar Market
Euro-Dollar-Benefits, Effects
Exchange Control Effect
Exchange Control
Exchange Control Methods
Exchange Control Procedure
Price Equalization
Intra Industry Trade Factors
Ohlin- Two Country Model
Intra-Industry Trade
Foreign Direct Investment
Industry Argument Diversification
Free Trade
Infant Industry Argument
Non-Economic Arguments
Employment Promotion Argument
Protection As Trade Policy
Protection-Developing Countries
Non-Tariff Barriers
Origin Of Gatt
Tariff Negotiations
Effects Of Quotas
Quotas Vs Tariffs
Quotas- Nature, Purpose
Import Quotas Types
Heterogeneous Markets
Internal, International Trade
International Trade Theory
International Transactions
Trade- Pure, Monetary Theory
Capital Movement Factors
Capital Movements Role
Capital Movements
International Development Ass.
International Finance Corp.
The World Bank
International Liquidity Adequacy
IMF, International Liquidity
International Liquidity
Paper Gold
Revaluation Of Gold
SDRS Salient Features
SDRS Operations
Symmetry- Monetary System
Triffins Radical Transformation
IMF Achievements
IMF Objectives, Functions
IMF Structure
Quotas
IMF Nature
Modern International Trade
International Trade Development
Product Cycle Hypothesis
Constant Factor Supply
Product Price Increase Effect
Vent-for-Surplus Approach
Foreign Trade Gains
Trade Gains Nature
Factors Determining Gain Size
Sources Of Gain
Factor Proportion Theory
Factor Proportions Assumptions
Trade Modern Theory
Factors Proportions Shortcomings
Absolute Cost Advantage
Gold Standard Mechanism
Underdevelop Comparative Costs
Comparative Costs Doctrine
Comparative Advantage Doctrine
Gold Standard Advantages
International Gold Standard
Gold Standard Game Rules
International Cartels
Price Discrimination, Dumping




Homework Help, Online Tutor, Online Tutoring Available For All Subjects. Some useful topics are given below :